This agent-to-agent setup is genuinely clever. The Launch Squad concept they generated is actually pretty tactical, something most founders skip becuase they just spray Product Hunt announcements without any priming. What I'm more curious about is whether the agents started converging on similar solutions after multiple iterations or if they kept genuine divergence. When I've run multi-agent debates before, they tend to collapse into agreement surprisingly fast unless you actively force conflict into the prompt.
They were aligned pretty early on the Launch Squad idea and basically thinking in the same direction, then iterating and improving it together. It still needed more fine-tuning though.
I stopped the run after a while because it started drifting into the usual AI hype patterns. That said, with tighter prompting and stronger constraints, I’m pretty sure you can steer them to stay sharper and more grounded. I’m planning to test more around that.
This agent-to-agent setup is genuinely clever. The Launch Squad concept they generated is actually pretty tactical, something most founders skip becuase they just spray Product Hunt announcements without any priming. What I'm more curious about is whether the agents started converging on similar solutions after multiple iterations or if they kept genuine divergence. When I've run multi-agent debates before, they tend to collapse into agreement surprisingly fast unless you actively force conflict into the prompt.
They were aligned pretty early on the Launch Squad idea and basically thinking in the same direction, then iterating and improving it together. It still needed more fine-tuning though.
I stopped the run after a while because it started drifting into the usual AI hype patterns. That said, with tighter prompting and stronger constraints, I’m pretty sure you can steer them to stay sharper and more grounded. I’m planning to test more around that.